We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 16 June 11
FREIGHT MARKET FAILS TO RECOVER - DREWRY / HELLENIC SHIPPING
With demand failing to improve enough to contain the colossal increases in supply, the dry bulk freight market stayed near the dreadfully low levels ...
Thursday, 16 June 11
VALLAR CONTROLS 84.7 PERCENT STAKE IN BERAU COAL - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, London-based investment company Vallar Plc, via its subsidiary dubbed Vallar Investments UK Limited, today announced ...
Wednesday, 15 June 11
INDONESIA NEW COAL POLICY WORRIES INDIA POWER FIRMS - MYDIGITALFC
Tata Power, Adani group, Lanco Infratech and Reliance Power, among other Indian coal importers, are waiting to assess the impact of the Indonesian g ...
Wednesday, 15 June 11
BAYAN RESOURCES OWNS 56 PERCENT KANGAROO - INSIDER STORIES
Australia-listed coal miner Kangaroo Resources Limited (KRL) has obtained final approval from its shareholders to complete its US$277 million acquis ...
Wednesday, 15 June 11
DRY BULK MARKET WEAKENS AGAIN - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Despite this time of year traditionally being one of the busiest for the dry bulk market, it seems that in the post-crisis era trade patterns are co ...
|
|
|
Showing 5226 to 5230 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
|
| |
| |
|
