We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 13 January 15
Q2 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP DECLINED 8.66% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined by US$ 3.48 (-5.73%) month over month and US$ 2.35 (-3.94%) week ...
Tuesday, 13 January 15
Q1' 2015 RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN Q2 & Q4 2015 SWAPS
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 7.21 ...
Monday, 12 January 15
COAL: LOW PRICES ARE EXPECTED TO DRIVE A SUPPLY-DRIVEN RECOVERY IN THE MEDIUM TERM - SGX
COALspot.com: Thermal coal prices dropped to six-year lows in 2014 driven by persistent oversupply, SGX says in its “ Commodities 2014 - A ye ...
Monday, 12 January 15
FREIGHT MARKET: 2015 FLEET SUPPLY GROWTH IS EXPECTED TO REMAIN SLIGHTLY AHEAD OF CARGO GROWTH - SGX
COALspot.com: The dry bulk freight market was forced to digest a number of negatives in 2014 leading the Baltic Dry Index to fall 66% through the y ...
Monday, 12 January 15
SHIPPING - CHALLENGES AND RESOLUTIONS - EVA TZIMA
Last year has without a doubt been another challenging one both for both our industry and our country. As Greece is currently dominated by election ...
|
|
|
Showing 3261 to 3265 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The University of Queensland
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- MS Steel International - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
|
| |
| |
|
