We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 January 15
MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
In Oil we trust! The Barrel price has declined by almost a third in comparison to the 2014 January and has being on the downhill since early last s ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
COMMODITIES AREN'T PRIMED FOR A REBOUND DURING 2015: SHIPPING COULD BENEFIT FROM LOWER PRICES - ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
In the recent past, higher commodity prices were driven by an increase in demand from developing countries, which spelled good news for ship owners ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q1 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 46.97 PMT
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has fell US$ 1.53 (-3.15 ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
Q4' 15 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED 4.51% LOWER COMPARED TO Q1' 15 PRICE
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 1.56 per MT (-3.0%) month over month and US$ 1.03 (-2.0%) week ove ...
Tuesday, 13 January 15
MORE PITFALLS FOR OWNERS LOOKING TO TERMINATE FOR UNPAID HIRE - INCE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is a debatable point whether or not the obligation to pay hire under a time charter is a condition of the contract or ...
|
|
|
Showing 3256 to 3260 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
|
| |
| |
|
