We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 27 January 15
Q1 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 47.87 FOR WEEK ENDING JAN. 23
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 gain week over week and declined month on month.
The Q1 swap has decline US$ 0.9 ...
Tuesday, 27 January 15
Q2 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP UP 4.5% W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.28 per MT (-0.54%) month over month and increased US$ 1.23 ( ...
Monday, 26 January 15
OVERSUPPLY, AMPLE STOCKPILES, AND LACKLUSTER UNDERLYING STEEL DEMAND KEPT COKING COAL PRICES LOW IN 2014
COALspot.com: Coking coal prices (FOB & CFR) fell 15% and 18% respectively during the year, amidst persistent oversupply, ample inventory and s ...
Monday, 26 January 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY Q2 COAL SWAP CLOSED LOWER THAN Q1 CLOSING
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1' 2015 declined month over month and day on day.
The Q1 swap has fell ...
Monday, 26 January 15
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CONTINUE TO SLIDE M-O-M; ROSE W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.79 (-1.33%) per MT month over month and gained US$ 2.10&nb ...
|
|
|
Showing 3231 to 3235 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
