We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 02 February 15
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP PICKS UP W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.81 (-1.36%) per MT month over month and gained US$ 0.18&nb ...
Monday, 02 February 15
SOUTH KOREA'S KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR 280K MT OF SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender to buy total 280,000 MT of Sub-bituminous coal coa ...
Sunday, 01 February 15
INDONESIA-TO-INDIA COAL FREIGHT RATES REMAIN WEAK NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI continued its fall reached lowest levels since 1986 this week.
The BDI declined 15.55 pct to 608 points on Friday 30, Ja ...
Friday, 30 January 15
CONTANGO AND TANKERS - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Like an invitation to a dance, the word contango may have some people flustered, but for tanker owners this market phenome ...
Friday, 30 January 15
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION REACHED 65.7 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
|
|
|
Showing 3221 to 3225 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
