We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 February 15
Q2' FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $63.45; $ 1.85 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q4 CLOSING
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 surge month over month, week on week and day on day.
The Q2 swap has ...
Monday, 16 February 15
COAL MINING SLUMP A BLESSING IN DISGUISE - THE JAKARTA POST
The growth of the coal-mining industry, which has diminished in the last two years, is expected to slump even further this year following weakening ...
Monday, 16 February 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS SURGE WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 1.31 per MT (+2.59%) week over week and US$ 4.35 (+9.13%) month on ...
Monday, 16 February 15
Q2' 15 - CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP ROSE 5.22% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 2.88 (+5.22%) per MT month over month and US$ 1.08 (+1.90% ...
Sunday, 15 February 15
BALTIC DRY INDEX CONTINUALLY DIPPED IN RED
COALspot.com: The Baltic Dry Index continues its decline and fell 5.18 pct to 530 points week on week due to falling commodity prices and declining ...
|
|
|
Showing 3191 to 3195 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The University of Queensland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
