We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 20 November 13
TAIPOWER TO IMPORT 0.825 MMT OF 5000 GAR COAL FOR Q2' 14
COALspot.com: Taiwan Power Company intends to procure 825,000 metric tons of general sub-bituminous coal with calorific value not lesser than 5,000 ...
Wednesday, 20 November 13
CAPES AND PANAMAXES SOFTENING; SMALLER SIZE SEGMENTS FIRMING FURTHER - INTERMODAL
Chartering (Wet: Firm+ / Dry: Stable- )
The BDI has closed off the week on the red, with rates for Capes and Panamaxes softening and those fo ...
Tuesday, 19 November 13
INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT'S DECLARED COAL PRICE REFERENCE UP 1.98% IN NOVEMBER
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has increased government declared coal bench mark price by US$ 1.52 / MT ...
Tuesday, 19 November 13
WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS FROM NEWCASTLE PORT INCREASED BY 20.59%
COALspot.com: In the week ended November 18, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totaled 2.92& ...
Tuesday, 19 November 13
SHIP OWNER POUR MORE MONEY INTO DRY BULK CARRIER ACQUISITIONS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The recent dry bulk market's rally, coupled with an expected fall in oversupply and robust cargo demand has boosted ship owners' optimism on the l ...
|
|
|
Showing 4001 to 4005 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
