We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 22 November 13
DRY BULK MARKET STILL LACKLUSTRE, DESPITE PROJECTIONS OF A NEW RALLY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
We might still be about six weeks far from the end of the year, but the projected by many analysts upcoming rally of the dry bulk market, hasn't ye ...
Friday, 22 November 13
US COAL PRODUCTION DOWN 1.3% W-W
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.5 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 21 November 13
TAIPOWER TO PROCURE 750K MT OF 5500 GAR BITUMINOUS COAL FOR MAY - AUGUST 2014
COALspot.com: Taiwan Power Company intends to procure 750,000 metric tons of bituminous coal with calorific value not lesser than 5,500 kcal/kg on a ...
Thursday, 21 November 13
CAPESIZE : THE DOWNWARD TREND HAS TURNED INTO NOTABLE SPOT AND PERIOD IMPROVEMENT - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The Atlantic market experienced a general rate increase for most trades this week. More cargoes in the market and chrts looking for prompt t ...
Wednesday, 20 November 13
PANAMAX MARKET RESUMED ITS NEGATIVE MOVEMENT FOR A SECOND WEEK IN A ROW - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The recovery noted the week prior in the dry Bulk market proved to be short-lived, as the BDI slipped back down to the low 1,500 point ...
|
|
|
Showing 3996 to 4000 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
|
| |
| |
|
