We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 14 November 23
CHINA'S BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE TURNS AWAY FROM COAL - WOOD MACKENZIE
Ambitious, contentious and big spending, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is 10 years old. In that time, China has splashed more than U ...
Friday, 10 November 23
THE COMMODITIES FEED: OIL UNDER PRESSURE - ING
Energy – Brent plummets
The oil market came under significant pressure yesterday. ICE Brent settled 4.19% lower on the day and ...
Friday, 10 November 23
COAL USE AT U.S. POWER PLANTS CONTINUES DOWNWARD SPIRAL; FULL IMPACT ON MINES TO BE FELT IN 2024 - IEEFA
This year, the use of coal by the U.S.’s power producers has been so anemic that the fuel has not achieved a 20% market share in any month so ...
Friday, 10 November 23
INDIA: NATIONAL COAL INDEX RISES 3.83 POINTS IN SEPTEMBER AMID HIGHER DEMAND - LIVEMINT
The National Coal Index (NCI) rose 3.83 points to 143.91 in September amid growing demand for coal.
The union coal ministry on Tuesd ...
Thursday, 09 November 23
WE'RE PRODUCING TOO MUCH COAL, OIL AND GAS, REPORT SAYS - WSJ
World leaders pledged in 2015 to reduce emissions in a combined effort to limit climate change.
Now they are stepping up production ...
|
|
|
Showing 76 to 80 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
