We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 01 December 23
COAL MINERS GROUP EXPECTS INDONESIA’S 2023 COAL OUTPUT TO SURPASS TARGET - REUTERS
The Indonesian Coal Mining Association (ICMA) expects the country’s 2023 coal output to surpass the official target of 695 million metric ton ...
Friday, 24 November 23
COAL IMPORTS TO INDIA IN OCTOBER 2023 REACHED HIGHEST LEVELS IN NEARLY A YEAR AND A HALF - VESSELSVALUE, VESON NAUTICAL
In October, coal imports to India reached 13.8 mt in October 2023, according to Oceanbolt, a Veson Nautical solution, the highest level since May 2 ...
Friday, 24 November 23
COAL SHIPMENTS TO ADVANCED ECONOMIES DOWN 17% SO FAR IN 2023 - BIMCO
In the first ten months of 2023, coal shipments to advanced economies fell by 17% y/y, as demand for electricity declined and the share of electric ...
Friday, 24 November 23
INTELLIGENT COAL MINES CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVING SAFETY STANDARDS - CHINA DAILY
Mechanization, automation and intelligent upgrades have contributed to improved safety in coal mines, though the level of development of intelligen ...
Friday, 24 November 23
WHY AUSTRALIA'S COAL MINES ARE GETTING BIGGER - IEEFA
Australia’s largest coal mines are getting larger. Mines in New South Wales (NSW) are ramping up production following the state’s recov ...
|
|
|
Showing 66 to 70 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
|
| |
| |
|
