We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 31 August 20
DEFECTIVE PASSAGE PLANNING: UNSEAWORTHINESS OR A NAVIGATIONAL DECISION? THE CMA CGM LIBRA QUESTION SAILS ON TO THE UK SUPREME COURT - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The UK Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal the recent decision in Alize 1954 v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (The “CMA CGM LIBRA”). While the decision involved General Average, we discuss the ramifications of the finding of unseaworthiness as it applies to the allocation of risk and liabilities in the wider context of the marine transport of goods.
International law aims to apportion risk in the transport of goods between the ship interests and cargo interests. Simply put, shipowners are responsible for cargo claims caused by unseaworthiness of the ship but are exempt from liability for cargo claims caused by certain risks, including navigational errors. The decision in Alize 1954 v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (The “CMA CGM LIBRA”) [2020] EWCA Civ 293 shifts the established boundary between what is considered “seaworthiness” and “navigation” resulting in shipowners bearing a greater portion of the risk of the adventure. While the CMA CGM LIBRA case involved General Average, it comes as no surprise that decision led to an increase in claims by cargo interests alleging unseaworthiness on the basis of navigational decisions. The vessel owners recently obtained permission to appeal the decision to the UK Supreme Court and the International Group of P&I Clubs supports the vessel owners’ position.
Background to the case
On 17 May 2011, M/V “CMA CGM LIBRA”, a 6,000 TEU container ship, grounded while leaving the port of Xiamen, China. The ship’s charts had failed to record a warning derived from a Notice to Mariners that depths shown on the chart outside the fairway were unreliable and waters were shallower than recorded on the chart. The grounding occurred when the master sailed the vessel outside of the fairway, expecting the waters to be deeper than they actually were. The owners claimed general average contributions from the cargo interests.
The first instance judgment
In Teare J’s first instance decision dated 8 March 2019, he held that the passage plan and working charts were defective due to the failure to record the warning required by the Notice to Mariners, and these defects rendered the vessel unseaworthy at the commencement of the voyage. The owners’ claims were therefore dismissed.
The first instance decision gave rise to significant controversy in maritime law circles. Some commentators held the view that the decision confused issues of unseaworthiness with issues of navigation. They argued that the preparation of passage plans is a matter of navigation, the neglect of which would entitle a carrier to defences under Article IV Rule 2(a) of the Hague or Hague-Visby Rules. By considering passage planning as falling within the orbit of seaworthiness rather than navigation, the court is disrupting the well-established division of risk between the ship and cargo. It has also been commented that applying a strictly temporal approach, i.e. that all acts or omissions prior to the commencement of the voyage relate to seaworthiness may have wider implication to re-distributing risk between the ship and cargo than the question of passage planning.
Other commentators saw the decision as a correct application of principles concerning a carrier’s duties in respect of seaworthiness, based on the traditional definition of seaworthiness laid down in McFadden v Blue Star Line (1905): “Would a prudent owner have required that [the relevant defect] should be made good before sending his ship to sea, had he known of it? If he would, the ship was not seaworthy.” On this view, given that no prudent shipowner would knowingly send his vessel to sea with a defective passage plan and defective charts that had not been properly updated, these commentators argued that it therefore follows that the vessel was not seaworthy at the commencement of the voyage.
The Court of Appeal decision
The first instance judgment was appealed, and for a time, it seemed that the controversy had been resolved following the handing down of the Court of Appeal’s judgment on 4 March 2020. In a unanimous decision by a 3-member panel of experienced shipping judges, the Court of Appeal upheld the first instance judgment. The Court confirmed that errors in navigation or management can render a vessel unseaworthy if they occur prior to the commencement of the voyage. The Court rejected the vessel owners’ argument that the passage plan and working chart were not “attributes of the ship”, but records of navigational decisions taken by the crew.
The Court also found that once the owners assumed responsibility for the cargo as the carrier, all acts of the master and crew in preparing the vessel for the voyage (even if they are acts of navigation performed before or at the commencement of the voyage) are performed qua carrier and not qua navigator. Thus, the owners are responsible for all such acts, and the crew’s failure to exercise due diligence to make the vessel seaworthy would be imputed to the owners.
Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court
In late July 2020, the owners obtained permission to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision to the UK Supreme Court. The owners’ position remains that the crew’s decision as to what to mark on the chart was a navigational decision rather than an “attribute of the ship” and was therefore not an issue of seaworthiness. It is anticipated that the appeal will take place in late 2021.
Concluding comments
Given the importance of this case regarding the allocation of risk between ship and cargo in a maritime adventure, the International Group of P&I Clubs welcome the UK Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case, and has backed the application made seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme court. Gard will continue to provide updates on developments in this case as they unfold.
Source: Gard
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 30 September 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Spot rates for Capesize bulk carriers received a significant boost last week, however, there are certain reservations in the market regarding the p ...
Tuesday, 29 September 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.73 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 125.91 points Monday, up 0.73 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
Tuesday, 29 September 20
SHIPPING MARKET - ALLIED
Here we are, just a short breath before the final quarter of the year, and many are now debating to what extent we can really expect a firm dry bul ...
Tuesday, 29 September 20
INDONESIAN COAL COMPANIES' EARNINGS TO WEAKEN IN 2H20 - FITCH RATINGS
Rated Indonesian coal miners and contractors will have weaker operating and financial performances in the second half of 2020 than in the first, sa ...
Tuesday, 29 September 20
RUSSIA'S COAL PRODUCTION TO DROP BY 10.5% IN 2020, SAYS MINISTRY - TASS
Russia’s Economic Development Ministry projects a 10.5% decrease in coal production in the country in 2020 compared with last year to 395 mln ...
|
|
|
Showing 771 to 775 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- The University of Queensland
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
