We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 05 June 20
U.S. SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE GUIDANCE RELEASED FOR THE GLOBAL MARITIME, ENERGY AND METALS SECTORS - AKIN GUMP
 Key Points
-
On May 14, 2020, OFAC, the Department of State and the U.S. Coast Guard jointly released guidance for persons involved in the maritime industry regarding common deceptive shipping practices used to subvert U.S. and United Nations sanctions programs targeting Iran, North Korea and Syria.
-
The guidance highlights certain deceptive practices employed in maritime activity that could signal sanctions evasion.
-
The guidance also contains specific measures that the maritime industry and energy and metals sectors can take to tailor their sanctions compliance programs to avoid sanctions violations or otherwise supporting illicit shipping activities.
-
This Guidance is part of a sustained focus on the international shipping industry, including the U.S. Government’s latest enforcement actions in the shipping sector on June 2, 2020.
The Guidance
On May 14, 2020, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the Department of State and the U.S. Coast Guard jointly released guidance (the “Guidance”) regarding common deceptive shipping practices in order to aid persons involved in the maritime industry, and energy and metals sectors, in tailoring their due diligence and sanctions compliance policies and procedures. The Guidance is particularly targeted towards ship owners, managers, operators, brokers, ship chandlers, flag registries, port operators, shipping companies, freight forwarders, classification service providers, commodity traders, insurance companies and financial institutions. The shipping industry continues to present particularly challenging issues associated with U.S. sanctions compliance, including the involvement of numerous parties in particular voyages all with different, yet overlapping risks.
The Guidance continues a further and concerted effort by OFAC to focus in particular on the shipping industry and builds on prior advisories that it has issued directed at the shipping industry, including one issued on September 4, 2019, entitled “Sanctions Risks Related to Shipping Petroleum and Petroleum Products from Iran” that also identified specific deceptive shipping practices and risk mitigation measures for the industry. As the U.S. Government’s latest enforcement actions on June 2, 2020 demonstrate, OFAC sanctions enforcement attention is squarely focused on the international shipping industry.
The Guidance also provides important insights for companies operating in the maritime sector regarding the criteria that OFAC applies when evaluating an effective sanctions compliance program for such companies.
Below we summarize key points from the Guidance that are relevant for the shipping sector, including a summary of deceptive practices highlighted in the Guidance, a summary of general practices for effective identification of potential sanctions evasion and summaries of guidance for certain actors in the maritime industry and country-specific guidance.
Deceptive Shipping Practices
The Guidance provides a summary of common tactics utilized to facilitate sanctionable or illicit maritime trade linked to Iran, North Korea and Syria, including:
-
Disabling or manipulating the Automatic Identification System (AIS) on vessels to conceal a vessel’s port of call or other information regarding its voyage.
-
Physically altering vessel identification to obscure the identities of sanctioned vessels or vessels engaging in sanctionable activities.
-
Falsifying cargo and vessel documents, particularly with respect to shipments involving petrochemicals, petroleum, petroleum products, metals (steel, iron) or sand to disguise their origin.
-
Ship-to-Ship (STS) Transfers used to conceal origin/destination of products.
-
Voyage irregularities to disguise the ultimate destination or origin of cargo, including indirect routing, unscheduled detours or transit or transshipment of cargo through third countries.
-
False flags and flag hopping (i.e., repeatedly registering vessels with new flag states).
-
Use of complex ownership or management to disguise the ultimate beneficial owner of cargo or commodities in order to avoid sanctions or other enforcement actions.
General Practices for Effective Identification of Sanctions Evasion
The Guidance also highlights, and provides details regarding, the following practices for effective identification of potential sanctions evasion:
-
Institutionalizing a sanctions compliance program, including through the implementation of written standardized operational compliance policies, procedures, standards of conduct and safeguards.
-
Establishing AIS best practices and contractual requirements that make disabling/manipulating AIS for illegitimate reasons grounds for termination of contracts or investigations.
-
Monitoring ships throughout the entire transaction lifecycle, including through supplementing AIS with Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) and receiving periodic LRIT signals on a frequency informed by the entity’s risk assessment.
-
Conducting “Know Your Customer” due diligence on customers and counterparties, which could include “maintaining the names, passport ID numbers, address(es), phone number(s), email address(es), and copies of photo identification of each customer’s beneficial owner(s).”
-
Exercising supply chain due diligence, including, as appropriate, conducting due diligence to ensure that recipients and counterparties to a transaction are not sending or receiving commodities that may trigger sanctions, such as Iranian petroleum or North Korea-origin coal, and implementing controls that allow for verification-of-origin and recipient checks for ships that conduct STS transfers.
-
Incorporating the above “best practices” into contracts.
-
Sharing information about sanctions evasion techniques and threats amongst industry groups.
Annex A: Actor-specific Guidance
In Annex A, the Guidance provides bulleted lists of guidance and information for particular actors within the maritime industry, including: maritime insurance companies, flag registry managers, port state control authorities, shipping industry associations, regional and global commodity trading, supplier, and brokering companies, financial institutions, ship owners, operators, and charterers, classification societies, vessel captains and crewing companies.
Below we summarize the guidance with respect to ship owners, operators and charterers, vessel captains and crewing companies.
Ship Owners, Operators, and Charterers:
-
Identify vessels that, in the past two years, have a pattern of AIS manipulation not consistent with the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea and terminating business relationships with clients that continue to use those vessels.
-
Keep and analyze records, including, where possible, photographs, of delivery and recipient vessels and/or recipients located at ports when possible, to enhance end-use verification.
-
Protect employees who reveal illegal or sanctionable behavior from retaliation.
-
Incorporate data into due diligence practices from organizations that provide commercial shipping data.
-
Communicate to counterparts as necessary and appropriate (e.g., ship owners, managers, charterers, operators) an expectation that they have adequate and appropriate compliance policies.
Vessel Captains:
-
Ensure deck officers are aware of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) AIS regulations, including the requirement to consistently broadcast AIS transmissions.
-
Communicate to ship owners and charterers that vessels are monitored for AIS disablement and that any occurrences of AIS disablement will be investigated.
-
Understand vessels’ AIS history to determine whether they may have been involved in illicit activities.
-
Before engaging in ship-to-ship transfers, verify the other vessel’s name, IMO number and flag, and ensure there is a legitimate business purpose for the transfer.
Crewing Companies:
-
Ensure crewmembers are aware of IMO guidance in relation to illicit shipping and the reasons why certain practices are unsafe.
-
Communicate to clients that crews are monitored for AIS disablement and that any occurrences of AIS disablement will be investigated.
-
Understand vessels’ AIS history to determine whether it may have been involved in illicit activities.
-
Ensure that crewmembers who reveal illegal or sanctionable activity are protected from retaliation and providing a confidential mechanism for reporting sanctionable conduct.
Annex B: Country Guidance
In Annex B, the Guidance summarizes relevant provisions of U.S. and U.N. sanctions programs concerning North Korea, Iran and Syria and actions prohibited under said programs relevant to the maritime industry. It also highlights a few points with respect to recent deceptive practices to facilitate illicit shipping to North Korea, Syria, and Iran which are summarized below.
North Korea:
North Korea reportedly exported 3.7 million metric tons of coal between January and August 2019, in violation of U.N. sanctions. Further, while under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2397, North Korea is limited to importing a maximum of 500,000 barrels of petroleum per year, from January to October 2019. North Korea ports received 221 tanker deliveries, which, if fully laden, would result in approximately 3.89 million barrels of imports. According to the Guidance, these illicit exports and imports are primarily effectuated via ship-to-ship transfers in Chinese territorial seas. Image 1 below depicts the most common areas in which such ship-to-ship transfers take place.
|
|
Common Locations of Ship-to-Ship Transfers subverting North Korean Sanctions1 |
North Korea is also reportedly acquiring vessels destined for scrapping and non-ocean-going barges that do not transmit AIS signals to engage in illicit import/export operations.
Syria:
The Guidance notes that “the supply chain and petroleum-related shipments [to Syria] create significant sanctions risk for those in the maritime industry.” As an example, it highlights the September 2019 OFAC action against Maritime Assistance LLC for facilitating the sale and delivery of jet fuel to Russian military forces operating in Syria. It also highlights the OFAC action in the November 2018 scheme in which Iranian and Russian entities engaged in a payment offsetting arrangement in which the sale and shipment of Iranian oil to Syria provided funding to Iran and proxy groups such as Hizballah, the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF).
Iran:
The Guidance did not provide specific guidance with respect to deceptive shipping practices used to subvert Iran-related sanctions—rather, it noted that the IRGC-QF continues to try to evade U.S. sanctions “by obfuscating the origin, destination, and recipient of oil shipments,” stating that “the use of such deceptive tactics is unique neither to Iran nor to Iran’s petroleum industry.”
Companies in the shipping industry or whose businesses intersect the shipping sector should assess their sanctions risk in light of this latest U.S. government guidance and make necessary modifications or enhancements to their compliance programs to mitigate this risk.
Source: Akin Gump, Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 18 May 20
THERMAL COAL SPOT PRICE TUMBLES 25 PER CENT, PUTTING PRESSURE ON SOME PRODUCERS - ABC RURAL
The spot price for thermal coal has fallen 25 per cent per cent in the past month with one leading analyst saying it is because of a reduction in d ...
Monday, 18 May 20
CHINA'S COAL OUTPUT UP 1.3 PCT IN JANUARY-APRIL: XINHUA
Output of raw coal in China rose 1.3 percent year on year to 1.15 billion tonnes in the first four months this year, official data showed.
&nbs ...
Sunday, 17 May 20
A 55,000 OPEN ILIGAN FIXING AT $6,500 VIA INDONESIA REDELIVERY INDIA - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
A precipitous fall in the market this week had the Capesize 5TC shedding over 50 per cent in value. A small rebound at the end of the ...
Friday, 15 May 20
CHINA'S COAL CONSUMPTION TO FALL Y/Y IN SECOND QUARTER, IMPROVEMENT EXPECTED IN SECOND HALF - INDUSTRY BODY: REUTERS
China’s coal consumption is expected to decline in the second quarter from a year earlier, but will see an improvement in the second half of ...
Thursday, 14 May 20
OPEC REVISES DOWN GLOBAL OIL DEMAND FORECAST AGAIN
Crude Oil Price Movements
Crude oil prices recorded a second sharp monthly drop in April, amid an increasing oil surplus in the spot market. Th ...
|
|
|
Showing 961 to 965 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- White Energy Company Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Coal Association
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
