We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 05 June 20
U.S. SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE GUIDANCE RELEASED FOR THE GLOBAL MARITIME, ENERGY AND METALS SECTORS - AKIN GUMP
 Key Points
-
On May 14, 2020, OFAC, the Department of State and the U.S. Coast Guard jointly released guidance for persons involved in the maritime industry regarding common deceptive shipping practices used to subvert U.S. and United Nations sanctions programs targeting Iran, North Korea and Syria.
-
The guidance highlights certain deceptive practices employed in maritime activity that could signal sanctions evasion.
-
The guidance also contains specific measures that the maritime industry and energy and metals sectors can take to tailor their sanctions compliance programs to avoid sanctions violations or otherwise supporting illicit shipping activities.
-
This Guidance is part of a sustained focus on the international shipping industry, including the U.S. Government’s latest enforcement actions in the shipping sector on June 2, 2020.
The Guidance
On May 14, 2020, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the Department of State and the U.S. Coast Guard jointly released guidance (the “Guidance”) regarding common deceptive shipping practices in order to aid persons involved in the maritime industry, and energy and metals sectors, in tailoring their due diligence and sanctions compliance policies and procedures. The Guidance is particularly targeted towards ship owners, managers, operators, brokers, ship chandlers, flag registries, port operators, shipping companies, freight forwarders, classification service providers, commodity traders, insurance companies and financial institutions. The shipping industry continues to present particularly challenging issues associated with U.S. sanctions compliance, including the involvement of numerous parties in particular voyages all with different, yet overlapping risks.
The Guidance continues a further and concerted effort by OFAC to focus in particular on the shipping industry and builds on prior advisories that it has issued directed at the shipping industry, including one issued on September 4, 2019, entitled “Sanctions Risks Related to Shipping Petroleum and Petroleum Products from Iran” that also identified specific deceptive shipping practices and risk mitigation measures for the industry. As the U.S. Government’s latest enforcement actions on June 2, 2020 demonstrate, OFAC sanctions enforcement attention is squarely focused on the international shipping industry.
The Guidance also provides important insights for companies operating in the maritime sector regarding the criteria that OFAC applies when evaluating an effective sanctions compliance program for such companies.
Below we summarize key points from the Guidance that are relevant for the shipping sector, including a summary of deceptive practices highlighted in the Guidance, a summary of general practices for effective identification of potential sanctions evasion and summaries of guidance for certain actors in the maritime industry and country-specific guidance.
Deceptive Shipping Practices
The Guidance provides a summary of common tactics utilized to facilitate sanctionable or illicit maritime trade linked to Iran, North Korea and Syria, including:
-
Disabling or manipulating the Automatic Identification System (AIS) on vessels to conceal a vessel’s port of call or other information regarding its voyage.
-
Physically altering vessel identification to obscure the identities of sanctioned vessels or vessels engaging in sanctionable activities.
-
Falsifying cargo and vessel documents, particularly with respect to shipments involving petrochemicals, petroleum, petroleum products, metals (steel, iron) or sand to disguise their origin.
-
Ship-to-Ship (STS) Transfers used to conceal origin/destination of products.
-
Voyage irregularities to disguise the ultimate destination or origin of cargo, including indirect routing, unscheduled detours or transit or transshipment of cargo through third countries.
-
False flags and flag hopping (i.e., repeatedly registering vessels with new flag states).
-
Use of complex ownership or management to disguise the ultimate beneficial owner of cargo or commodities in order to avoid sanctions or other enforcement actions.
General Practices for Effective Identification of Sanctions Evasion
The Guidance also highlights, and provides details regarding, the following practices for effective identification of potential sanctions evasion:
-
Institutionalizing a sanctions compliance program, including through the implementation of written standardized operational compliance policies, procedures, standards of conduct and safeguards.
-
Establishing AIS best practices and contractual requirements that make disabling/manipulating AIS for illegitimate reasons grounds for termination of contracts or investigations.
-
Monitoring ships throughout the entire transaction lifecycle, including through supplementing AIS with Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) and receiving periodic LRIT signals on a frequency informed by the entity’s risk assessment.
-
Conducting “Know Your Customer” due diligence on customers and counterparties, which could include “maintaining the names, passport ID numbers, address(es), phone number(s), email address(es), and copies of photo identification of each customer’s beneficial owner(s).”
-
Exercising supply chain due diligence, including, as appropriate, conducting due diligence to ensure that recipients and counterparties to a transaction are not sending or receiving commodities that may trigger sanctions, such as Iranian petroleum or North Korea-origin coal, and implementing controls that allow for verification-of-origin and recipient checks for ships that conduct STS transfers.
-
Incorporating the above “best practices” into contracts.
-
Sharing information about sanctions evasion techniques and threats amongst industry groups.
Annex A: Actor-specific Guidance
In Annex A, the Guidance provides bulleted lists of guidance and information for particular actors within the maritime industry, including: maritime insurance companies, flag registry managers, port state control authorities, shipping industry associations, regional and global commodity trading, supplier, and brokering companies, financial institutions, ship owners, operators, and charterers, classification societies, vessel captains and crewing companies.
Below we summarize the guidance with respect to ship owners, operators and charterers, vessel captains and crewing companies.
Ship Owners, Operators, and Charterers:
-
Identify vessels that, in the past two years, have a pattern of AIS manipulation not consistent with the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea and terminating business relationships with clients that continue to use those vessels.
-
Keep and analyze records, including, where possible, photographs, of delivery and recipient vessels and/or recipients located at ports when possible, to enhance end-use verification.
-
Protect employees who reveal illegal or sanctionable behavior from retaliation.
-
Incorporate data into due diligence practices from organizations that provide commercial shipping data.
-
Communicate to counterparts as necessary and appropriate (e.g., ship owners, managers, charterers, operators) an expectation that they have adequate and appropriate compliance policies.
Vessel Captains:
-
Ensure deck officers are aware of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) AIS regulations, including the requirement to consistently broadcast AIS transmissions.
-
Communicate to ship owners and charterers that vessels are monitored for AIS disablement and that any occurrences of AIS disablement will be investigated.
-
Understand vessels’ AIS history to determine whether they may have been involved in illicit activities.
-
Before engaging in ship-to-ship transfers, verify the other vessel’s name, IMO number and flag, and ensure there is a legitimate business purpose for the transfer.
Crewing Companies:
-
Ensure crewmembers are aware of IMO guidance in relation to illicit shipping and the reasons why certain practices are unsafe.
-
Communicate to clients that crews are monitored for AIS disablement and that any occurrences of AIS disablement will be investigated.
-
Understand vessels’ AIS history to determine whether it may have been involved in illicit activities.
-
Ensure that crewmembers who reveal illegal or sanctionable activity are protected from retaliation and providing a confidential mechanism for reporting sanctionable conduct.
Annex B: Country Guidance
In Annex B, the Guidance summarizes relevant provisions of U.S. and U.N. sanctions programs concerning North Korea, Iran and Syria and actions prohibited under said programs relevant to the maritime industry. It also highlights a few points with respect to recent deceptive practices to facilitate illicit shipping to North Korea, Syria, and Iran which are summarized below.
North Korea:
North Korea reportedly exported 3.7 million metric tons of coal between January and August 2019, in violation of U.N. sanctions. Further, while under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2397, North Korea is limited to importing a maximum of 500,000 barrels of petroleum per year, from January to October 2019. North Korea ports received 221 tanker deliveries, which, if fully laden, would result in approximately 3.89 million barrels of imports. According to the Guidance, these illicit exports and imports are primarily effectuated via ship-to-ship transfers in Chinese territorial seas. Image 1 below depicts the most common areas in which such ship-to-ship transfers take place.
|
|
Common Locations of Ship-to-Ship Transfers subverting North Korean Sanctions1 |
North Korea is also reportedly acquiring vessels destined for scrapping and non-ocean-going barges that do not transmit AIS signals to engage in illicit import/export operations.
Syria:
The Guidance notes that “the supply chain and petroleum-related shipments [to Syria] create significant sanctions risk for those in the maritime industry.” As an example, it highlights the September 2019 OFAC action against Maritime Assistance LLC for facilitating the sale and delivery of jet fuel to Russian military forces operating in Syria. It also highlights the OFAC action in the November 2018 scheme in which Iranian and Russian entities engaged in a payment offsetting arrangement in which the sale and shipment of Iranian oil to Syria provided funding to Iran and proxy groups such as Hizballah, the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF).
Iran:
The Guidance did not provide specific guidance with respect to deceptive shipping practices used to subvert Iran-related sanctions—rather, it noted that the IRGC-QF continues to try to evade U.S. sanctions “by obfuscating the origin, destination, and recipient of oil shipments,” stating that “the use of such deceptive tactics is unique neither to Iran nor to Iran’s petroleum industry.”
Companies in the shipping industry or whose businesses intersect the shipping sector should assess their sanctions risk in light of this latest U.S. government guidance and make necessary modifications or enhancements to their compliance programs to mitigate this risk.
Source: Akin Gump, Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 02 June 20
THE HISTORIC DECLINE OF US COAL - WOOD MACKENZIE
The first commercial power plant in the US was Thomas Edison’s coal-fired Pearl Street station in lower Manhattan, which started operating in ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
COAL INDIA'S MAY SALES DRIVEN SHARPLY LOWER BY SLUMP IN POWER DEMAND - REUTER
Coal India’s sales fell 23.3% in May as utilities refrained from purchases amid record stockpiles and tepid demand because of a nationwide lo ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
TUAH TURANGGA AGUNG RECORDED 4.54 MILLION TONS OF COAL SALES IN THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF 2020
PT United Tractors Tbk through its subsidiary, PT Tuah Turangga Agung recorded 4.54 million tons of coal sales in the first four months of 2020, up ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
SOURING SINO-AUSTRALIA TRADE RELATIONS - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Cooling relations between the commodity powerhouses of China and Australia may point to trade troubles ahead when the world emerges from the Covid- ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.86 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 123.95 points Monday, down 0.86 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
|
|
|
Showing 936 to 940 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Australian Coal Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
