We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Sunday, 07 April 19
SHIP PASSAGE PLANS - NO ROOM FOR ERROR! - WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The English High Court’s judgment in Alize 1954 v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG (The CMA CGM Libra) is an important decision involving the application of longstanding principles as to a shipowner’s liability for actionable fault following a casualty. In finding that a defective passage plan rendered a vessel unseaworthy, the English High Court has demonstrated how traditional tests will be applied to update the law into the modern day world.
Prior to this decision, there had been no case whereby a defective passage plan rendered a vessel unseaworthy. However, it is now clear that just as the standard of seaworthiness must rise with improved knowledge of shipbuilding, so must the standard of seaworthiness rise with improved knowledge of the documents required to be prepared to ensure safe navigation. Following the IMO’s recognition in 1999 of the need for passage planning to be adopted by “all ships engaged on international voyages”, The CMA CGM Libra shows that by 2011 the English courts expected an adequate passage plan to have been prepared. If it was defective, the consequences could be severe.
The Case
The case concerned a laden container vessel which grounded by virtue of the master negligently navigating outside of the buoyed fairway when leaving the port of Xiamen in China. The owner had known this to be a difficult port to navigate, especially as various Notices to Mariners had been issued advising that areas existed in the Xiamen Gang (though not in the fairway) that had depths less than those charted.
Cargo interests refused to pay the owner their proportion of the total claim in general average and denied liability under Article III r.1 of the Hague Rules on the basis that the casualty was caused by the owner’s actionable fault. In particular, they alleged that the vessel was unseaworthy because she had an inadequate passage plan, that inadequacy was a cause of the casualty and due diligence was not exercised by the owner to make the vessel seaworthy.
The Decision
Before considering the substantive matters of unseaworthiness, causation and due diligence, Mr Justice Teare addressed the issue of which party bears the burden of proof in relation to Article III r.1. He affirmed the conventional view that the burden lies on the cargo interests to establish that the vessel was unseaworthy and such unseaworthiness caused the grounding. If those matters are established, the burden then lies on the owners to prove that due diligence was exercised to make the vessel seaworthy.
Unseaworthiness
Mr Justice Teare held that neither the formal passage plan, nor the working chart, contained the necessary warning of the potential danger arising outside the buoyed fairway from the existence of areas with lower depths than charted. The necessary warning should have been such that, when the navigator was faced with a decision whether to remain in the buoyed fairway or to navigate outside, he had in mind the warning that charted depths outside the buoyed fairway may be unreliable.
The judge affirmed that the long-established and authoritative test of unseaworthiness is whether a prudent owner would have required the relevant defect, had he known of it, to be made good before sending his ship to sea. He found it inconceivable that a prudent owner would allow the vessel to depart from Xiamen with a passage plan that lacked the necessary warning, especially given that IMO Resolution of 1999 states that a “well planned voyage” is of “essential importance for safety of life at sea, safety of navigation and protection of the marine environment”.
The owner argued that passage planning is simply the preparation for safe navigation and is not itself an aspect of seaworthiness. In making these arguments, the owner sought to benefit from the negligent navigation exception under Article IV r.2(a) of the Hague Rules, which provides that (assuming there is no failure by the owners to make the vessel seaworthy) a shipowner will not be responsible for loss caused by neglect in the “navigation or in the management of the ship”.
However, Mr Justice Teare rejected this, stating that seaworthiness extends to having the appropriate documentation on board, including the appropriate charts. Firstly, he noted that Article III r.1 places a seaworthiness obligation upon the shipowner “before and at the beginning of the voyage” and that passage planning before the beginning of the voyage is necessary for safe navigation during voyage. Secondly, he pointed out that it is well recognised that if a vessel’s charts are not up to date that is an “attribute” of the vessel which can render her unseaworthy – and that a proper passage plan is now like an up to date and properly corrected chart.
Mr Justice Teare also suggested that a “one-off” failure to correct a chart in a material manner before the beginning of the voyage is capable of rendering a vessel unseaworthy, even if the shipowner has put in place proper systems to ensure that the prerequisite materials were on board to prepare an adequate chart. He explained that concentrating upon the shipowner’s own actions to the exclusion of those of his servants or agents, confuses the issue of seaworthiness with the issue of due diligence, which in any event is a non-delegable duty.
Finally, Mr Justice Teare observed that the negligent navigation exception applied only to Article III r.2 and not Article III r.1. Therefore, a shipowner will not be protected from liability for failing to exercise due diligence to make the vessel seaworthy by the fact that a cause of the casualty was negligent navigation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this case found that an appropriate passage plan is a matter of seaworthiness under Article III r.1 of the Hague Rules. This is not the type of chart that might traditionally have been expected to affect the seaworthiness of a vessel, especially as a passage plan relates principally to navigation of the ship. Nevertheless, following this judgment, shipowners will have to ensure that, through its agents and servants, due diligence is exercised to produce a non-defective passage plan that clearly contains the necessary warnings. Failure to do so, if causative of a casualty, will not be saved by the negligent navigation exception under Article IV r 2(a) of the Hague Rules, which cannot be applied where a shipowner has failed to exercise due diligence to make the vessel seaworthy.
Source: Watson Farley & Williams
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 25 January 24
THE RED SEA ESCALATION IMPLICATIONS ON GLOBAL SEABORNE TRADE - MARIA BERTZELETOU
In recent days, discussions have intensified about the potential impact on the seaborne trade and ton-miles due to the evolving dynamics of market ...
Thursday, 25 January 24
RED SEA SHIPPING DISRUPTIONS KEEP GEOPOLITICAL PREMIUM FOR COMMODITIES - FITCH RATINGS
Shipping disruptions and re-routing away from the Red Sea will maintain the geopolitical premium in the main commodity markets, including for oil a ...
Friday, 19 January 24
INDONESIA TARGETS 710 MLN METRIC TONS COAL OUTPUT IN 2024 AFTER RECORD 2023 - REUTERS
Indonesia, a major thermal coal exporter, aims to produce 710 million metric tons of coal in 2024, its mining minister said on Monday, after postin ...
Friday, 19 January 24
DRUMMOND COLOMBIA COAL OUTPUT ROSE 7.1% IN 2023 - REUTERS
Coal production from miner Drummond’s Colombia operations rose 7.1% in 2023 to 29.5 million metric tons, while exports declined by 2.6% to 27 ...
Friday, 19 January 24
CHINA'S 2023 COAL OUTPUT HITS RECORD HIGH - REUTERS
China’s coal output reached a record high in 2023, data from the statistics bureau showed on Wednesday, amid an ongoing focus on energy secur ...
|
|
|
Showing 51 to 55 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The University of Queensland
- Economic Council, Georgia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
