We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 June 24
PHILIPPINES COAL SUPPLY ENOUGH UNTIL 2030 - PHILSTAR GLOBAL
The country’s existing coal-fired power plants are sufficient to ensure enough base load capacity in the next six years, Energy Secretary Rap ...
Friday, 14 June 24
NEXTDECADE, SAUDI ARAMCO SIGN 20-YEAR LNG SUPPLY DEAL - REUTERS
U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) provider NextDecade has signed a non-binding agreement with Saudi Aramco 2222.SE to supply 1.2 million tonnes per ...
Friday, 14 June 24
NEWBUILDING PRICES CLIMB 3% TO HIGHEST LEVEL IN 16 YEARS - NIELS RASMUSSEN
“Since the start of the year, newbuilding prices have risen 3% to their highest level since 2008. Compared to their most recent low in late 2 ...
Friday, 14 June 24
INDIA TARGETS HIGHER DOMESTIC COAL PRODUCTION, REDUCED IMPORTS: GOVT - REUTERS
India wants to reduce coal imports and increase domestic production, federal coal minister G. Kishan Reddy said on Thursday.
The cou ...
Thursday, 13 June 24
US LNG TO ASIA FOR POWER GENERATION EXPECTED TO CUT EMISSIONS VERSUS COAL - RYSTAD ENERGY
The value-chain emissions of liquified natural gas (LNG) are lower on average than for coal-fired power generation, even when the fuel is shipp ...
|
|
|
Showing 16 to 20 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
