We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 01 November 21
COAL PRICES HAVE FURTHER ROOM TO DROP: TOP ECONOMIC PLANNER - GLOBAL TIMES
China’s top economic planner said coal prices have further room to drop on Friday, as the most traded coal futures dropped to below 1,000 yua ...
Saturday, 30 October 21
CHINA'S COAL PRICES SEE BIGGEST WEEKLY FALL IN MORE THAN 5 YEARS - REUTERS
China’s coal futures prices saw their biggest fall in more than five years after the powerful state planner said there is still room to adjus ...
Saturday, 30 October 21
G-20 LEADERS PREPARE STATEMENT TO STOP FUNDING FOREIGN COAL PLANTS - BLOOMBERG
Leaders of the Group of 20 wealthy economies are preparing to pledge to stop funding foreign coal-fired plants, but are still wrangling over climat ...
Friday, 29 October 21
APAC THERMAL COAL SUPPLY TO REMAIN TIGHT AS WINTER LOOMS - FITCH RATINGS
APAC thermal coal prices have surged, hitting historically high levels. The benchmark Newcastle 6,000kcal/kg grade coal reached USD228/tonne in mid ...
Thursday, 28 October 21
CANADA BAN ON SHIPPING COAL WOULD EQUAL SCRAPPING AS MANY AS 3 MILLION CARS - IEEFA
Canada ban on shipping coal would equal scrapping as many as 3 million cars
Change in Canadian policy could have major implications ...
|
|
|
Showing 426 to 430 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
|
| |
| |
|
