We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 26 November 21
CHINA FINDS COMPLIANCE PROBLEMS IN COAL PRICE INDEX PROBE - REUTERS
China’s state planner on Wednesday said it had discovered some “noncompliant” behaviour among coal price index providers as it an ...
Thursday, 25 November 21
SE ASIA POWER DEMAND TO RISE AS STATE SUPPORT MITIGATES COVID-19 IMPACT - FITCH RATINGS
Electricity demand in south-east Asia is likely to increase in 2021, following slow growth or contraction in 2020, thanks to state support that has ...
Thursday, 25 November 21
FITCH RATINGS INCREASES MOST GLOBAL METALS AND MINING PRICE ASSUMPTIONS - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings has increased most metals and mining price assumptions, particularly those that benefit from increased longer-term demand due to glob ...
Thursday, 25 November 21
CHINA'S COAL PRICE DROPS IN MID-NOVEMBER AMID GOVERNMENT’S SWEEPING MEASURES - GLOBAL TIMES
China’s coal prices have dropped significantly in mid-November compared with the beginning of the month, with the price of coking coal and co ...
Wednesday, 24 November 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Inflation is the word that has dominated the meetings of foreign leaders and finance ministers in recent weeks, as rising energy costs, supply chai ...
|
|
|
Showing 401 to 405 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
