We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 11 June 22
AIMTEK INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND AWARDS
Press Release: The prestigious AIMTEK International Conference and Awards concluded successfully on June 7th, 2022 at Radisson Blu, Yas Island Abu ...
Thursday, 26 May 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The newbuilding market activity has been significantly positive from a dry bulk owner perspective during the first half of 2022. Indeed, the contra ...
Wednesday, 18 May 22
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE DROPPED 4.42% IN MAY
COALspot.com: Indonesian Coal Price Reference for May delivery drops 4.42 per cent month on month.
The Indonesian Coal Price Referen ...
Thursday, 12 May 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Almost through half of the year, the overall shipping market continues to show signs of healthiness, after plenty of festivities and holidays that ...
Wednesday, 27 April 22
EUROPEAN UNION'S LNG IMPORTS - BANCHERO COSTA
In 2021, the European Union (27) was the third largest seaborne importer of LNG in the world, with a 15.8% share.
It followed Mainla ...
|
|
|
Showing 321 to 325 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
|
| |
| |
|
