We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 06 October 22
COAL INDIA ASKED TO ENHANCE SUPPLY TO THERMAL POWER PLANTS - IANS
With the festival season round the corner, Coal India Ltd. has been directed by the government to scale up dispatch to thermal power plants.
&n ...
Wednesday, 05 October 22
BUNKER PRICES DOWN AGAIN; IS THERE MORE TO COME? - INTEGR8 FUELS
It’s the economy…..”
VLSFO prices are now back to levels at the start of this year. After all the extremes of thi ...
Wednesday, 05 October 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Amid the looming western sanctions on Russia, the country is challenged to pivot its energy markets away from Europe and toward the East. Yet, Russ ...
Tuesday, 04 October 22
A REMARKABLE SHIFT IN FORTUNES HAS BEEN NOTED IN THE CRUDE OIL TANKER MARKETS - ALLIED SHIPPING
A remarkable shift in fortunes has been noted in the crude oil tanker markets over the past month, yet despite these shifts being seemingly in thei ...
Tuesday, 04 October 22
OIL PRICES COULD SOON RETURN TO $100 AS OPEC+ CONSIDERS ‘HISTORIC’ CUT, ANALYSTS SAY - CNBC
An influential alliance of some of the world’s most powerful oil producers is reportedly considering their largest output cut since the start ...
|
|
|
Showing 216 to 220 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- The University of Queensland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
