We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 29 November 22
SEABORNE COAL FLOWS IN 2022 - SIGNAL
This year is crucial for the energy mix in European countries, as the EU has imposed new sanctions on Russia. It is important to emphasize that the ...
Friday, 25 November 22
APAC THERMAL COAL PRICES CORRECT FROM RECORD HIGH - FITCH RATINGS
Prices of Newcastle 6,000kcal/kg coal have corrected following falling European gas and coal prices, and more supply from Australia could help miti ...
Thursday, 24 November 22
VIETNAM BOOSTS COAL USE PLAN FOR 2030 AS G7 CLIMATE OFFER STALLS - REUTERS
Vietnam has increased its coal power target for 2030 under a revised draft energy plan, government documents seen by Reuters show, while renewables ...
Tuesday, 22 November 22
THE GENCON 2022 CHARTERPARTY - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
BIMCO has published a revamped version of the popular GENCON charterparty. Our author, Helena Biggs, was a member of the ...
Tuesday, 22 November 22
INDIA POWER BINGES ON COAL, OUTPACES ASIA - REUTERS
India’s coal-fired power output has increased much faster than any other country in the Asia Pacific since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine ...
|
|
|
Showing 186 to 190 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Australian Coal Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
|
| |
| |
|
