We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 18 March 23
HEDGE TO OFFSET LNG VOLATILITY, TRADERS TOLD - BALTIC EXCHANGE
A shift in imports from Asia to Europe led to significant volatility in liquefied natural gas shipping last year, prompting industry experts to urg ...
Friday, 17 March 23
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE UP AROUND 2.17% IN MARCH 2023
COALspot.com: Indonesian Coal Price Reference up around 2.17% in March 2023.
According to the new HBA regulation No. 41.K/MB.0 ...
Saturday, 11 March 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Uncertainty over the recovery of Chinese demand, demand destruction in Europe, as well as weather conditions will pivot the LNG market this summer. ...
Wednesday, 08 March 23
INDONESIAN COAL REFERENCE PRICE FORMULA HAS OFFICIALLY CHANGED
Indonesian Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources has officially changed the guideline for determining the benchmark price for the sale of coal c ...
Thursday, 02 March 23
INDIA'S SEABORNE CRUDE OIL IMPORTS IN 2022 INCREASED BY 11.5% YOY - BANCHERO COSTA
2022 has turned out to be a very positive year for crude oil trade, despite the surging oil prices and risks of economic recession, Banchero Costa ...
|
|
|
Showing 126 to 130 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The University of Queensland
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Planning Commission, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
