We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 12 May 20
A GLOBAL ECONOMIC RESTART HAS SLOWLY BEGUN AS COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD GRADUALLY - ALLIED
A global economic restart has slowly begun as countries around the world gradually set their return back to “normality”. Yet by all mea ...
Tuesday, 12 May 20
CAN INDONESIA'S COAL INDUSTRY SURVIVE COVID-19? : IEEFA
Pandemic Lockdown and Slumping Prices Put Extreme Pressure on Coal Miners
Executive Summary
While attention has been focused on th ...
Tuesday, 12 May 20
INDIA'S COAL PRODUCTION TO CLOCK RECORD 700 MILLION TONNES IN FY21: COAL SECRETARY - PTI
Coal Secretary Anil Jain said FY20 coal production was lower than the target of 660 million tonnes because of flooding of a key coal mine.
&nbs ...
Monday, 11 May 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE DROPS SLIGHTLY - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price dropped slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge ...
Monday, 11 May 20
CORONAVIRUS PUTS MORE THAN A THIRD OF SEABORNE COAL SUPPLY AT RISK - WOOD MACKENZIE
The full impact of the coronavirus outbreak on the global economy is yet unclear. However, the demand destruction is already becoming evident, with ...
|
|
|
Showing 971 to 975 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
