We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 29 May 20
KOMIPO ON BEHALF FIVE KOREAN GENCOS INVITED COAL BIDS FOR 5,700 & 4999 NCV COAL FOR AUGUST 2020 LOADING
COALspot.com: South Korea’s Korea Midland Power Co.,Ltd (KOMIPO) on behalf five (5) Korean Gencos has Issued an International Tender for tota ...
Friday, 29 May 20
DRY BULK SHIPPING: NO QUICK RECOVERY FOR THE DRY BULK MARKET AS COVID-19 DIGS DEEPER
The outlook is poor for dry bulk, as the negative demand shock and overcapacity come together to send rates to multi-year lows, even a return to wo ...
Thursday, 28 May 20
COVID-19: A FORCE MAJEURE EVENT? - KYPRIANOU
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
While seeing the unexpected COVID-19 outbreak expanding worldwide and the first cases being identified in Cyprus, the com ...
Thursday, 28 May 20
OIL DEMAND RECOVERED BY 20% IN MAY AGAINST APRIL: RUSSIAN ENERGY MINISTER - TASS
Oil demand remains at a low level but the demand in May increased by 20% against April, Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak said, cited by the ...
Thursday, 28 May 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Earlier in May, China’s top leaders convened for the annual National People's Congress, following over two months of delays due to the co ...
|
|
|
Showing 946 to 950 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
