We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 01 August 20
SHIP SHAPE - OUCH: FIS
Thursday afternoon saw a report that US GDP in Q2 shrank by 32.9%. Now this may have beaten expectations, but it’s a bit like saying that you ...
Saturday, 01 August 20
ASIA HOPE FOR LONG-TERM OIL DEMAND - BALTIC BRIEFING
Oil demand in Asia Pacific might be expected to plunge 1.8m barrels per day (bpd) this year, but there are still strong prospects for growth over t ...
Friday, 31 July 20
SHORT-TERM IMPACT ON THE CHEMICAL SHIPPING MARKET IF THE INDIA-CHINA DISPUTE ESCALATES - DREWRY
Due to the India-China dispute, the threat of deteriorating trade relations between the two countries has become real. Meanwhile, we expect freight ...
Friday, 31 July 20
PANAMAX: THE PERIOD MARKET REMAINS QUIET WITH FEW FIXTURES REPORTED - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
After weeks of dropping rates, there are finally some resistance for the Capes. Pacific rounds improving to upper15,000s by the middle ...
Friday, 31 July 20
PANDEMIC SENDING SOUTH AFRICAN COAL INDUSTRY TO EARLIER GRAVE - IEEFA
Could South Africa’s coal export industry, one of the largest in the world, be about to take a severe hit from the coronavirus?
...
|
|
|
Showing 851 to 855 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Coal Association
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Planning Commission, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
