We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 04 September 20
IN A DEEPENING DEBT HOLE OF $34 BILLION, INDONESIA’S PLN MUST STOP DIGGING - IEEFA
The utility has added IDR100 trillion in debt annually for the last five years
Utilities globally started changing the way they do business ye ...
Friday, 04 September 20
KOMIPO INVITED BIDS FOR AUSTRALIAN MIN 5,700 NCV COAL FOR NOVEMBER
COALspot.com: Korea Midland Power Co. Ltd, has issued an International tender for 260,000 MT Min.5,700 kcal/kg NCV coal November, 2020 loading. Acc ...
Thursday, 03 September 20
BRINGING SERVICES OF FTCCI CLOSER TO THE EXPORTERS AT GMR AIR CARGO COMPLEX AT SHAMSHABAD
Press Release: “FTCCI Trade Facilitation Services at your doorstep now” says J.S. Chandrashekar, IRS., Principal Commissioner of Custom ...
Thursday, 03 September 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE REMAINS FLAT - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price remained flat during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
Wednesday, 02 September 20
COAL PRODUCTION FALLS 7% IN APR-AUG; OFF TAKE DIPS 13.4% - FINANCIAL EXPRESS
In the month of August coal off take also increased 9.3% y-o-y to 44.34 MT as compared with 40.57 MT in the same period last year.
C ...
|
|
|
Showing 796 to 800 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
