We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 November 20
AUSTRALIAN COAL EXPORTS TO CHINA SLUMP, BUT PRICES ARE MIXED - REUTERS
China’s unofficial ban on coal imports from Australia is starting to take its toll on volumes, with departing cargoes down sharply so far in ...
Friday, 13 November 20
SHIPPING OUTLOOK TURNS STABLE ON EBITDA GROWTH, IMPROVING SUPPLY-DEMAND BALANCE - MOODY’S
Outlook revised to stable from negative.
The global shipping industry is on course to perform better overall than we had previously ex ...
Friday, 13 November 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE EDGES UP - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price rose slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
Monday, 09 November 20
INDONESIA MAY CUT BIODIESEL USE TARGET AS SUBSIDY FUND DEPLETES - FITCH
The Indonesian government may rein in its push to increase use of biodiesel as it now comes at higher cost following a fall in crude oil prices and ...
Monday, 09 November 20
SOUTH AFRICA: COAL MARKET CONDITIONS HAVE ' DETERIORATED MATERIALLY' - IEEFA
The Asian seaborne thermal coal pool is drying out
Resource Generation Ltd’s proposed but long delayed Boikarabelo coal mine i ...
|
|
|
Showing 736 to 740 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- The University of Queensland
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Coal Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
