We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 21 December 20
COAL'S PARTIAL RECOVERY IS SET TO FADE AFTER 2021 - IEA
Global coal consumption is estimated to have fallen by 7%, or over 500 million tonnes, between 2018 in 2020. A decline of this size over a two-year ...
Monday, 21 December 20
A REBOUND IN GLOBAL COAL DEMAND IN 2021 IS SET TO BE SHORT-LIVED, BUT NO IMMEDIATE DECLINE IN SIGHT - IEA
After a major drop in recent years, global coal demand is forecast to rise by 2.6% in 2021 before flattening out to 2025
A global ec ...
Friday, 18 December 20
AUSTRALIA PM WARNS OF ‘LOSE-LOSE’ IN ANY CHINA COAL SHIFT - REUTERS
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison said any shift by China away from importing high quality Australian coal would be a “lose-lose&rdquo ...
Friday, 18 December 20
BIG OIL AND COAL EXPORTERS FACE RECKONING AS PARIS AGREEMENT TURNS FIVE - CNA
On Dec 12, more than 70 global leaders came together at the UN’s Climate Ambition Summit, marking the fifth anniversary of the Paris Agreemen ...
Friday, 18 December 20
SOUTH AFRICAN COAL EXPORTERS LARGELY DEPENDENT ON THE ASIAN MARKETS - BANCHERO COSTA
South Africa is the fourth largest exporter of coal in the world, after Australia, Indonesia and Russia. In calendar 2019 the country exported a to ...
|
|
|
Showing 696 to 700 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
