We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 11 July 21
COAL SHOWS ITS STAYING POWER AS ECONOMIES BOUNCE BACK - THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Coal use is surging in some of the world’s largest economies as electricity demand rebounds from the pandemic, illustrating the challenges to ...
Sunday, 11 July 21
ROBUST CHINA COAL DEMAND AMID AUSTRALIA IMPORT BAN FUELS PRICE RALLY - REUTERS
Seaborne coal has become a quiet winner among energy commodities, lacking the attention of higher-profile crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) ...
Saturday, 10 July 21
OVERESTIMATED LCOES OF COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS CREATE A FINANCIAL BUBBLE - IEEFA
Massive stranded asset risk detrimentally affects the financial and power distribution
India’s future coal-fired power project pipeline ...
Friday, 09 July 21
EIA FORECASTS COAL’S GENERATION SHARE IN U.S TO RISE FROM 20% IN 2020 TO 24% THIS YEAR BUT TO FALL TO 22% NEXT YEAR
The July Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) of EIA remains subject to heightened levels of uncertainty related to the ongoing economic recovery from ...
Friday, 09 July 21
KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO., LTD. INVITES BIDS FOR 1.86 MILLION TONS OF COAL OF 5600 & 4000 NCV COAL FOR THREE YEARS
COALspot.com: South Korea’s KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO., LTD. (KOEN) has issued an international tender for 280,000 – 300,000 MT of Min. ...
|
|
|
Showing 526 to 530 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Planning Commission, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|