We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 19 July 15
BDI GAINED AND CROSSED 1000 MARK THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI gained and crossed 1000 mark after many months this Friday. The BDI was up almost 20 pct and closed 1048 points on 17 July 20 ...
Saturday, 18 July 15
INTERVIEW : FRANZ ESCALANTE, CHIEF OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, MINERA CHINALCO, PERU
We are interested in the technology of Autonomous trucks, the new-generation trucks are not remote controlled, they are truly autonomous - Franz Es ...
Friday, 17 July 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. INCREASES SHARPLY FOR THE WEEK ENDING JULY 11
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 16.4 million short ...
Friday, 17 July 15
INDONESIAN POWER-STATION COAL SWAPS DECLINE CONTINUES THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q3 2015 declined month on month and week over week, this past week.
The Q3 swap was declined $ ...
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc ...
|
|
|
Showing 2916 to 2920 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
|
| |
| |
|
