We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 26 August 15
2Q'16 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FALLS NEARLY 4.76 PER CENT M-O-M
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was declined $ 2.20 (-5.13%) p ...
Tuesday, 25 August 15
INDONESIA MINERS' NPLS TO RISE FURTHER, BANK RISKS BUILD - FITCH
The NPLs of Indonesian mine and mine services companies are likely to rise further in the short term, says Fitch Ratings, after reaching multi-year ...
Tuesday, 25 August 15
MINER'S EARNINGS DROP ON FALLING COAL PRICES; Q2'16 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 52.23 A TON
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery 4Q' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The 4Q swap was down US$ ...
Monday, 24 August 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS HIT FRESH LOW, DIPPING BELOW $42 A TON
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down $ 2.20 per MT (-5.01%) month over month to US$ 41.70 per mt. The swap ...
Monday, 24 August 15
Q1'16 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 48.65 PMT
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined just US$ 1.89 (3.74%) per MT month over month.
A commodity ...
|
|
|
Showing 2851 to 2855 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
