We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 19 January 12
14TH VOGP MEETING IN HO CHI MINH CITY HANDS OUT LATEST UPDATES AND DEVELOPMENTS IN VIETNAM'S ENERGY INDUSTRY
Press Release: At upcoming 14th Vietnam Oil Gas Power on 27-28 Feb in Ho Chi Minh City the industry’s most influential names including Petrovi ...
Thursday, 19 January 12
DELTA DUNIA SEALS US$820 MIO CONTRACT INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk (DOID) has announced that its primary operating subsidiary, PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama ( ...
Wednesday, 18 January 12
WARM WINTER ACROSS EUROPE HAS IMPACTED NEGATIVELY COAL DEMAND - BRS
With the Chinese New Year just a week away, all markets are slowing down. The drop in freight rates for all sizes has been significant over the past ...
Wednesday, 18 January 12
DRY BULK MARKET'S DRAMA CONTINUES IN START OF NEW WEEK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
A flurry of newbuilding deliveries, coupled with a slow start to the new year, a typical trend for the dry bulk market, has led the industry's benc ...
Monday, 16 January 12
BUMA MINED 2.7 MILLION TONS COAL LAST MONTH
COALspot.com - BUMA has mined 2.7 million tons (-14.1% YoY) coal last month and removed 25.8 million bcm (-5.6% YoY) overburden, according to compan ...
|
|
|
Showing 4881 to 4885 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
