We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 14 July 12
FREIGHT MARKET SEEMS TO BE QUITE VOLATILE - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The market seems to be quite volatile with the trend changing almost every week. This week all the segments were down except for Pana ...
Friday, 13 July 12
TRANSCOAL MINERGY HAS RECEIVED PMA STATUS IN INDONESIA
COALspot.com - PT Transcoal Minergy (“TCM”) has received official foreign owned company status from the Capital Investment Coordinating ...
Thursday, 12 July 12
LACK OF CAPESIZE DEMAND DRAGS DRY BULK MARKET LOWER - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
A lack of demand for the larger Capesize dry bulk carriers had as a result the fall of the industry’s benchmark, the BDI (Baltic Dry Index), w ...
Thursday, 12 July 12
RIO TINTO'S SENIOR MANAGEMENT CHANGES
COALspot.com - Rio Tinto is making changes to its senior management team as chief financial officer (CFO) Guy Elliott has decided to retire at the e ...
Thursday, 12 July 12
SOUTHGOBI RESOURCES ANNOUNCES NOTICE OF INVESTMENT DISPUTE FILED AGAINST MONGOLIAN GOVERNMENT
Press Release - SouthGobi Resources Ltd. (TSX: SGQ, HK: 1878) (“SouthGobi”) announced today that SGQ Coal Investment Pte. Ltd., a wholly ...
|
|
|
Showing 4656 to 4660 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|