We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 31 August 12
ADVERSE SHIPPING MARKET CONDITIONS SHORTENS LIFE SPAN OF VESSELS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The adverse conditions which have been put in place in the world's freight markets, means that ship owners are forced to scrap vessels of a much yo ...
Thursday, 30 August 12
INDO-INDIA, LARGE ECO SUPRA NOW FIXED AT USD 7K FOR DELIVERY SINGAPORE - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The Supra market continued its negative trend with little fresh business entering the market. Continent positions fixed around USD 4k for tri ...
Thursday, 30 August 12
DRY BULK MARKET STILL LOOKING OUT FOR BETTER DAYS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
With things in China moving slowly this week, as a result of holidays, it’s no surprise that the latest positive trend in the dry bulk market ...
Wednesday, 29 August 12
COLOMBIA'S MINING BOOM: PART TWO - JOSEPH KIRSCHKE
One of the most prominent casualties of Canada's entry into the Colombian mining sector has been a priest named Jose Reynal-Restrepo. Last Septembe ...
Wednesday, 29 August 12
COLOMBIA'S MINING BOOM: PART ONE - JOSEPH KIRSCHKE
COALspot.com - Colombia stands before one of the potentially largest, most diversified mining booms in the world. Untold reserves of gold, coal, cop ...
|
|
|
Showing 4596 to 4600 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Economic Council, Georgia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
|
| |
| |
|
