We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 27 September 12
MINING RE-COMMENCES AT ORPHEUS' B2 EAST KALIMANTAN COAL PROJECT
- B2 project overburden removal completed and coal exposed
- Coal getting has commenced with target production of 30,000tpm
- Orpheus to re ...
Thursday, 27 September 12
HANDY: THE PACIFIC MARKET IS GETTING WEAKER WITH UPCOMING GOLDEN WEEK HOLIDAYS - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
Yet another week with rates softening in all trades. Especially owners with ships open Continent struggle to find employment paying decent mo ...
Thursday, 27 September 12
DRY BULK MARKET LOSES STEAM - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The rise of the BDI (Baltic Dry Index), the dry bulk industry’s benchmark during the course of the previous week, proved to be short-lived, as ...
Wednesday, 26 September 12
NEWBUILDING ORDERING ACTIVITY REMAINS SUBDUED ON GLOBAL MARKET UNCERTAINTY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Newbuilding ordering activity has been on the down side during the past few weeks, a trend also noticeable during the course of the past few days, a ...
Sunday, 23 September 12
AN ANOTHER UNSTABLE WEEK FOR INDONESIAN COAL SWAPS
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for November 2012 delivery lost 1.10 percent and 0.916 percent WOW and DOD respectively ...
|
|
|
Showing 4556 to 4560 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- White Energy Company Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Planning Commission, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
