We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 12 November 12
DRILLING COMPLETED AT THE MOORLANDS DEPOSIT, WEST BOWEN PROJECT
Press Release - Cuesta Coal Limited (ASX: CQC) (“Cuesta”) is pleased to announce it has completed its exploration activities at the Moor ...
Monday, 12 November 12
BARGE-LOAD OF 5K TONNES OF COAL FROM THE ADK JOINT VENTURE SHIPPED LAST WEEK
COALspot.com - Orpheus Energy (ASX:OEG) has announced that, it has successfully shipped a 5,000 tonne of ADK thermal coal to an Indonesian trading g ...
Sunday, 11 November 12
AN OPTIMISTIC WEEK FOR INDONESIAN SUB-BIT COAL
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for January 2013 delivery gains 2.08 percent WoW and 1.28 percent DoD on Friday, 9 November ...
Sunday, 11 November 12
THE IRON ORE AND COAL PRICES MOVEMENTS REMAINS LOW - VISTAAR
COALspot.com The market remained soft with all the sectors soft.
The BDI and was down by 4.67 pct closing at 940 points, on Friday 9 Novemb ...
Friday, 09 November 12
SHIP OWNERS TURN TO SECOND HAND VESSELS, WHICH COME AT ATTRACTIVE PRICES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The attractiveness of modern second hand vessels, which are often priced aggressively can't be ignored by cash-rich ship owners, who are taking adv ...
|
|
|
Showing 4506 to 4510 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PTC India Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Australian Coal Association
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
