We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 10 August 13
DEMOLITION ACTIVITY TO BE CRUCIAL AGAIN IN PROVIDING SUPPORT TO THE DRY BULK MARKET - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
We appear to have forgotten demolition activity this year, with the Baltic Dry Index gaining traction in the latter part of the second half and emer ...
Friday, 09 August 13
US PRODUCED 4.00 PERCENT LESS COAL ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United states the world’s second largest coal producer produced totaled approximately 20.00 million short tons (mmst) of ...
Thursday, 08 August 13
HANDY : NO POSITIVE SENTIMENT FOR THE FAR EAST MARKET - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
No positive sentiment for the Far East market. There are a number of ships coming open in SE Asia this week and owners rating mid/high USD 8k ...
Thursday, 08 August 13
MALAYSIA HOSTS THIRD ANNUAL ASIAN SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL USERS' GROUP CONFERENCE
Press Release : The third Annual Asian Sub-Bituminous Coal Users’ Group (ASBCUG) conference convenes Sept. 30-Oct. 3 at the Eastern & Orie ...
Wednesday, 07 August 13
HANDIES : FINDING IT DIFFICULT TO SUSTAIN THEIR PREVIOUS LEVELS - KONSTANTINOS KONTOMICHIS
Broker's insight
by Konstantinos Kontomichis,
SnP Broker
Entering the most predictable month of the year, as expected the seasonal effects ha ...
|
|
|
Showing 4171 to 4175 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PTC India Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The University of Queensland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
