We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 09 June 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP Q3 14 DELIVERIES LOST 4.61% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q3 14 deliveries lost 4.61 percent month on month and closed at US$ 71.62 per mt a ...
Sunday, 08 June 14
DRY BULK MARKET RATES FOR PANAMXES TO REMAIN VOLATILE; NO IMPROVEMENTS SEEN OVER THE WEEK
COALspot.com: Cape index increase pushes BDI index to 989 points week on week. The BDI firmed up by 5.88 pct and closed at 989 points week ended 6 ...
Saturday, 07 June 14
EVERYTHING CHANGES, AND NOTHING ABIDES - HERACLITUS
A couple of weeks ago, and while everyone was focusing on the struggling freight market, Russia and China made history by signing a three-decade lo ...
Saturday, 07 June 14
FIRST BITE AT ANTI-CORRUPTION CLAUSE - BIMCO
In recent years a number of countries have introduced anti-corruption legislation which, unfortunately, fails to recognise the practical implicatio ...
Saturday, 07 June 14
U.S. MONTHLY COAL PRODUCTION SLIGHTLY HIGHER IN MAY 2014
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.2 million short tons (mmst) of coal in a ...
|
|
|
Showing 3666 to 3670 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
