We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 18 June 14
CHINESE STEEL PRODUCTION SETS RECORD DURING FIRST TEN DAYS OF JUNE - COMMODORE RESEARCH & CONSULTANCY
Recently released data shows that average daily crude steel production at China's key steel mills hit a record high of 1.833 million tons durin ...
Wednesday, 18 June 14
MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
Back in January the expectations for Q3 and Q4 were more than great. Talks and claims for a rising BDI and a healthy market were coming from everyw ...
Tuesday, 17 June 14
DRY BULK FREIGHT RATES TO RISE DURING THE SECOND HALF OF 2014, AS CHINA IS EXPECTED TO START IMPORTING MORE IRON ORE FROM BRAZIL - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
In its latest analysis of the dry bulk market, BIMCO said that it doesn’t expect freight rates to react significantly to increased demand bef ...
Monday, 16 June 14
INDONESIAN COAL SWAPS FOR Q3 DELIVERY FALL 2.34 % MONTH ON MONTH
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q3’ 2014 lost on day, week and on month according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports re ...
Monday, 16 June 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS FALL CONTINUES THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q3 14 deliveries lost 4.34 percent month on month and closed at US$ 71.05 per mt a ...
|
|
|
Showing 3651 to 3655 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- MS Steel International - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
|
| |
| |
|