We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 02 July 14
HANDY BULKERS PROVE TO BE THE MOST SOUGHT AFTER VESSELS OVER THE PAST WEEK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The Handy dry bulker proved to be the most sought after ship by ship owners active in the second hand market, which saw a slight decline in terms o ...
Wednesday, 02 July 14
SHIPPING: MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE DERMATIS
After 6 months, 57 ministerial meetings and 67 political agreements, the journey of the Greek Presidency in the EU reached its end yesterday; only ...
Tuesday, 01 July 14
INDIAN POWER PLANT COAL STOCKPILES VERY LOW
COALspot.com: According to today's Weekly Dry Bulk Report published by Commodore Research, Indian power plant coal stockpiles have now fallen t ...
Monday, 30 June 14
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL PRICES ARE STILL STRUGGLING TO RECOVER
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q3’ 2014 lost on week and on month according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports release ...
Monday, 30 June 14
WEEKLY CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS DECLINE CONTINUES; Q1'15 LOST US$ 4.55 PMT IN A WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for delivery in Q3 fell US$ 5.25 month on month on Friday, dipping under $69 a tone. The CFR South Ch ...
|
|
|
Showing 3631 to 3635 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The University of Queensland
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|