We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 10 July 14
SGX EXPANDS ACROSS THE BULKS WITH NEW COAL PRODUCTS
COALspot.com: Singapore Exchange (SGX) is expanding its bulk commodity derivatives offering by launching new coking and thermal coal products on 4 ...
Thursday, 10 July 14
HANDY: SMALL INCREASE; PANAMAX: POSITIVE TONE; CAPESIZE: PAPER VALUES REMAIN WEEK
Handy
It is a general increase in activity in both hemispheres whereas rates have just experienced a small increase. In the Feast we see stable a ...
Wednesday, 09 July 14
SHIP INVESTMENTS ARE TRENDING LOWER
Most ship owners are deeming current ship prices on the high side, refraining from making serious commitments in new acquisitions or newbuilding or ...
Wednesday, 09 July 14
INDIAN GOVERNMENT ADVISED POWER UTILITIES TO INCREASE COAL IMPORTS
COALspot.com: The government of India has advised power utilities to increase coal imports to meet fuel shortages and those that have fuel supply p ...
Wednesday, 09 July 14
PANAMAX MARKET FINALLY CORRECTING UPWARDS; AVERAGE TC MORE THAN DOUBLING WEEK ON WEEK - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market has closed off on Friday on a more positive note, with most segments noting weekly gains and the Panamax market finally correct ...
|
|
|
Showing 3611 to 3615 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- White Energy Company Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
