We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 18 July 14
3RD CHINA INTERNATIONAL SHALE GAS SUMMIT
Building on the massive success of the past 2 shale gas programs that has generated huge success by attracting 500+ industry players, and intrig ...
Friday, 18 July 14
US WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION UP BY 1.4% TO 18.3 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.3 million short tons (mmst) of coal in a ...
Thursday, 17 July 14
PANAMAX : MARKET HAS COOLED DOWN AGAIN TO LOW AND DEPRESSED LEVELS
Handy
The supra market remains pretty flat in the Atlantic while for the smaller sizes there has been little reported with ships chasing business ...
Thursday, 17 July 14
INDIAN GOVERNMENT WISE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF CURRENTLY LOW THERMAL COAL PRICES AND SHIPPING RATES - JEFFREY LANDSBERG
With thermal coal import prices (and also shipping rates) very low at present, India's government would be very wise to take advantage of curre ...
Wednesday, 16 July 14
INDIA BUDGET HAS LIMITED SHORT TERM IMPACT ON POWER SECTOR - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings says that the measures announced relating to India's electricity sector in the budget for FY2015 are directionally correct but in ...
|
|
|
Showing 3596 to 3600 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- MS Steel International - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The University of Queensland
- Planning Commission, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
|
| |
| |
|
