We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 09 September 14
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 13.207 MTN OF COAL IN AUGUST; TRADE VALUE AROUND $1.17 BILLION
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped $1.17 billio ...
Monday, 08 September 14
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP UNDERPERFORMED LAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average October 2014 decreased US$ 0.20 (-0.39%) day on day and US$ 1.60 (-3.04%) per mt week on week. The ...
Monday, 08 September 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR DELIVERY JAN'15 CLOSED AT US$ 66.30 PMT W/E 5 SEPTEMBER 2014; LOST 5.15% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for delivery in October 2014 decreased US$ 0.15 (-0.23%) day on day and US$ 2.05 (-3.04%) week on wee ...
Monday, 08 September 14
CHINESE IRON ORE IMPORT DEMAND VERY STRONG - COMMODORE
COALspot.com: 30 dry bulk vessels were chartered in the spot iron ore market last week to haul iron ore import cargoes to Chinese buyers.
Acco ...
Sunday, 07 September 14
FREIGHT MARKET CONTINUED TO BE FIRM IN SPITE OF CAPE'S THIS WEEK'S WEAK PERFORMANCE
COALspot.com: BDI up by 0.7 pct week on week and closed at 1155 points this week. The Baltic Dry Index is a composite of three sub-indexes that mea ...
|
|
|
Showing 3496 to 3500 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- PTC India Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Coal Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Planning Commission, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
