We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 18 November 14
VALEMAX DEAL TO DETERMINE DRY BULK MARKET'S FATE - DREWRY MARITIME RESEARCH
Vale’s accord to sell and lease four Valemax vessels to COSCO might have negative repercussions on dry bulk freight rates. Vale has committed ...
Tuesday, 18 November 14
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP DELIVERY Q2' 2015 CLOSED AT $ 49.55; DOWN 4.10% M-O-M
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month, gained week on week and day on day.
The Q1 swap has lost US ...
Tuesday, 18 November 14
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 2015 DELIVERY CLOSED AT $ 66.31; UP 1.33% W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has gained US$ 0.27 (+0.41%) month over month and US$ 0.87 (+1.33%) week ...
Tuesday, 18 November 14
CHEAP OIL PRICES COULD RESHAPE GLOBAL OIL EXPORTING MAP - HELLENIC SHIPPING
Tanker owners have enjoyed a rather healthy 2014, but as the year draws to a close, the fall of oil prices is bound to reshape traditional, as well ...
Monday, 17 November 14
SKULD ISSUES URGENT NOTICE ON BANKRUPTCY OF OW BUNKER A/S
Further to the Association’s advices of 7 November 2014, more information has come to light with respect to the potential impact and scale of ...
|
|
|
Showing 3366 to 3370 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PTC India Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
