We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 26 November 14
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - EVA TZIMA
The tanker market has been enjoying some good returns lately. Ok, that may be a big understatement, but with all the ups and downs of the past year ...
Tuesday, 25 November 14
FISCAL BREAKEVEN OIL PRICES SHOW SOVEREIGN VULNERABILITY - FITCH
COALspot.com: The vulnerability of the sovereign credit profiles of net oil exporters, as shown by their fiscal breakeven oil prices, suggests that ...
Tuesday, 25 November 14
UK: TRIBUNAL RULES ON SPEED AND PERFORMANCE CLAIMS UNDER TWO CONSECUTIVE TIME CHARTERPARTIES - REED SMITH
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
“Owners not to be responsible if the vessel under the currency of this charter party stays at port or anchorage or ...
Tuesday, 25 November 14
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP FOR Q4' 15 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 68.20
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal for delivery Q1' 2015 gained month on month, week on week and day over day.
The Q1 swap has gain ...
Tuesday, 25 November 14
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q2' 15 DELIVERY CLOSED AT $ 49.55
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month, gained week on week.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 0.12 (-0.24%) ...
|
|
|
Showing 3346 to 3350 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The University of Queensland
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- London Commodity Brokers - England
|
| |
| |
|
