We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 05 December 14
CHINESE SPECIAL STEEL MAKERS' RISK PROFILES MORE RESILIENT - FITCH
Fitch Ratings says the risk profiles of Chinese makers of special steel, especially high-end products, are more like those of manufacturers and mor ...
Friday, 05 December 14
U.S. YEAR-TO-DATE COAL PRODUCTION REACHED AROUND 905 MMST - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
Thursday, 04 December 14
CAPE MARKET IS DEVELOPING FROM BAD TO WORSE
Handy
The Atlantic market has been pretty stable and balanced this week, Fearnleys AS says in its latest weekly report.
The broker furt ...
Thursday, 04 December 14
DRY BULK MARKET; ANOTHER DISAPPOINTING WEEK
COALspot.com: For those who have been hoping to see alignment of freight direction across the Dry Bulk market, this must have been another disappoi ...
Wednesday, 03 December 14
PROGRESSING SMELTER PROJECTS IN INDONESIA
Press Release: Indonesia’s ban on ‘raw mineral export’ that was designed to encouraging downstream investment in mineral processi ...
|
|
|
Showing 3326 to 3330 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
