We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 January 15
MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
In Oil we trust! The Barrel price has declined by almost a third in comparison to the 2014 January and has being on the downhill since early last s ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
COMMODITIES AREN'T PRIMED FOR A REBOUND DURING 2015: SHIPPING COULD BENEFIT FROM LOWER PRICES - ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
In the recent past, higher commodity prices were driven by an increase in demand from developing countries, which spelled good news for ship owners ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q1 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 46.97 PMT
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has fell US$ 1.53 (-3.15 ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
Q4' 15 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED 4.51% LOWER COMPARED TO Q1' 15 PRICE
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 1.56 per MT (-3.0%) month over month and US$ 1.03 (-2.0%) week ove ...
Tuesday, 13 January 15
MORE PITFALLS FOR OWNERS LOOKING TO TERMINATE FOR UNPAID HIRE - INCE & CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is a debatable point whether or not the obligation to pay hire under a time charter is a condition of the contract or ...
|
|
|
Showing 3256 to 3260 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Planning Commission, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
