We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 07 July 22
COAL INDIA'S PRODUCTION SETS RECORD INCREASE OF 29% YOY AT 36 MT IN Q1FY23 - IIFL SECURITIES
Coal India Limited (CIL) has ended April-June quarter FY’23 capping a historic high of 29% yoy output growth, compared to same quarter FY&rsq ...
Wednesday, 06 July 22
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Following the 3rd Decarbonizing Shipping Forum, held in Hamburg on June 2022, there has been a meaningful resurgence of discussions within the ship ...
Tuesday, 05 July 22
WHY ARE VLSFO PRICES SO HIGH, ESPECIALLY IN SINGAPORE? - STEVE CHRISTY, INTEGR8 FUELS
Tightness in products still trumps talks of recession
Last month we wrote about the fears of recession versus the tightness in product markets ...
Tuesday, 05 July 22
ADANI ENTERPRISES LOWEST BIDDER IN COAL INDIA'S IMPORT TENDER: REPORT - BUSINESS STANDARD
Coal India Ltd floated its first import tender on behalf of power companies, where Adani Enterprises Ltd came out to be the lowest bidder, a report ...
Tuesday, 05 July 22
CHINA POLICY KEY FOR IRON ORE OUTLOOK - ING
China’s covid lockdowns and recessionary risks hit iron ore
Iron ore prices have fallen significantly from their year-to-date high of US$ ...
|
|
|
Showing 301 to 305 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- The University of Queensland
|
| |
| |
|
