We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 11 May 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP: DECLINED MOM AND WOW
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.46 (-0.90%) per MT month over month and US$ 0.28 (0. ...
Monday, 11 May 15
KOREA MIDLAND POWER INVITES BIDS FOR 140K MT OF 4600 NAR COAL
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a new tender to buy total 140,000 Metric Tons (MT) of Sub-bitumi ...
Sunday, 10 May 15
FREIGHT RATES TO REMAIN SOFT NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market was flat to soft week over week except for the Cape Index which was up 7.32%. Cape index was closed at 616 p ...
Friday, 08 May 15
BUSIEST CAPESIZE DEMOLITION MARKET EVER - BIMCO
The activity on the demolition market is off to a good start in 2015 when looking at dry bulk tonnage.
The dry bulk market has long suffered f ...
Friday, 08 May 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN U.S. UP 3.2% THIS PAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.4 million short ...
|
|
|
Showing 3031 to 3035 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- White Energy Company Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Coal Association
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|