We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 20 May 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS GAINED M-O-M, W-O-W
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 increased month over month and week over week.
The Q3 swap has increas ...
Wednesday, 20 May 15
BUKIT ASAM'S AVERAGE EXPORT PRICE WAS UNDER PRESSURE DURING Q1
COALspot.com: Indonesia’s state owned coal producer saw their profits fall in the first quarter of the year compared to the same period last ...
Wednesday, 20 May 15
IRON ORE PRICES TO REMAIN WEAK ON LOW DEMAND, HIGH OUTPUT - FITCH
Iron ore prices will stay low for several years due to increasing supply, weak demand growth in China and the slower-than-expected closure of high- ...
Tuesday, 19 May 15
KOMIPO IS SEEKING TOTAL 2.34 MMT OF HCV AND LCV COAL FOR 2015 - 2017
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender to buy total 2.34 million Metric Tons (MT) of HCV ...
Monday, 18 May 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS SCORE MONTHLY GAINS
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery gained US$ 0.87 per MT (1.99%) month over month and lost US$ 0.03 week on w ...
|
|
|
Showing 3016 to 3020 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Australian Coal Association
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
