We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 08 June 15
SHIPPING FLEET GROWTH HAS STARTED TO SLOW DOWN, AS NEWBUILDINGS AMOUNT TO JUST 329 SHIPS OF ALL TYPES SINCE THE START OF 2015 - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Challenging market conditions have led to the inevitable reconsideration of ship owners’ priorities. Uncertainty has been the norm over the p ...
Monday, 08 June 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS ADVANCED M-O-M AND W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery increased US$ 0.65 per MT (1.44%) month over month to US$ 45.65 per mt. The ...
Monday, 08 June 15
Q3'15 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP ADVANCED 3.51% TO $52.48 PMT THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 1.78 (3.51%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap is a ...
Sunday, 07 June 15
PANAMAX INDEX ROSE OVER 13% THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market was up on all segments this past week. The BDI was advanced 3.56% and closed at 610 points. The Cape Index was cli ...
Friday, 05 June 15
U.S PRODUCED 15.1 MMST OF COAL THIS PAST WEEK; LESS 20.7% COMPARED TO SAME PERIOD IN 2014
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.1 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2986 to 2990 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
|
| |
| |
|
